<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Myth (SF) &#8211; We&#8217;re Too Cool to Cook</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.chuckeats.com/2007/02/28/myth-sf-were-too-cool-to-cook/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.chuckeats.com/2007/02/28/myth-sf-were-too-cool-to-cook/</link>
	<description>International adventures in cuisine</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 01 Feb 2012 23:14:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dan Lyke</title>
		<link>http://www.chuckeats.com/2007/02/28/myth-sf-were-too-cool-to-cook/comment-page-1/#comment-257</link>
		<dc:creator>Dan Lyke</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Feb 2007 19:18:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://chuckeats.com/blog3/2007/02/28/myth-sf-were-too-cool-to-cook/#comment-257</guid>
		<description>I think that reviews like this are helpful both to warn us away from certain places (although my budget doesn&#039;t allow exploring too much right now), but also to give a better perspective on what your likes and dislikes are. A good critic isn&#039;t necessarily one that I always agree with, it&#039;s someone whose prose tells me enough about the subject that I&#039;ll know if I&#039;ll like it. That partially comes from knowing more about the tastes of the critic.

So, yeah, I find this useful as well!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think that reviews like this are helpful both to warn us away from certain places (although my budget doesn&#8217;t allow exploring too much right now), but also to give a better perspective on what your likes and dislikes are. A good critic isn&#8217;t necessarily one that I always agree with, it&#8217;s someone whose prose tells me enough about the subject that I&#8217;ll know if I&#8217;ll like it. That partially comes from knowing more about the tastes of the critic.</p>
<p>So, yeah, I find this useful as well!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rory</title>
		<link>http://www.chuckeats.com/2007/02/28/myth-sf-were-too-cool-to-cook/comment-page-1/#comment-253</link>
		<dc:creator>Rory</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Feb 2007 02:30:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://chuckeats.com/blog3/2007/02/28/myth-sf-were-too-cool-to-cook/#comment-253</guid>
		<description>Ah, crap.  Right after hitting submit I noticed that I misspelled &quot;descriptions&quot; and misplaced the period after &quot;good.&quot;  Sloppy, careless and haphazard...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ah, crap.  Right after hitting submit I noticed that I misspelled &#8220;descriptions&#8221; and misplaced the period after &#8220;good.&#8221;  Sloppy, careless and haphazard&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rory</title>
		<link>http://www.chuckeats.com/2007/02/28/myth-sf-were-too-cool-to-cook/comment-page-1/#comment-252</link>
		<dc:creator>Rory</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Feb 2007 02:28:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://chuckeats.com/blog3/2007/02/28/myth-sf-were-too-cool-to-cook/#comment-252</guid>
		<description>I find this very useful, although I wouldn&#039;t get any more detailed than what you&#039;ve put above.  Pictures might be nice, but I wouldn&#039;t bother with getting too detailed of discriptions if all you want to say is &quot;Not good&quot;.

[evil English major comment: the word is &quot;haphazard&quot; not &quot;half-hazard&quot; - a careless mistake to be sure ;-)]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I find this very useful, although I wouldn&#8217;t get any more detailed than what you&#8217;ve put above.  Pictures might be nice, but I wouldn&#8217;t bother with getting too detailed of discriptions if all you want to say is &#8220;Not good&#8221;.</p>
<p>[evil English major comment: the word is "haphazard" not "half-hazard" - a careless mistake to be sure <img src='http://www.chuckeats.com/blog3/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';-)' class='wp-smiley' /> ]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

